In the corporate sphere , there are instances of misconduct that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that shake the foundations of integrity . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that significantly damages the reputation of a lone supervisor but calls into question over the company’s principles .
Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has held onto his title , apparently unimpacted by the uproar surrounding him . How has this been enabled to go on ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? From what insiders reveal , Collins’ history of questionable behavior was initiated by breaking of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it didn’t conclude at that point . Instead, it escalated into a pattern of misconduct that has left colleagues jaded and stakeholders confused .
Throughout a leadership improvement workshop— ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities —David Collins allegedly converted what should have been a development chance into a sequence of unprofessional occurrences. It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his family remained uninformed .
But the misconduct didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged abuse of company IT David Collins Venita systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a breakdown of professionalism . His bold misuse of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — reveals a character of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital dalliances, Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite his own marital status and her having a significant other. This transparent exploitation of company time and resources not only violated professional boundaries but resulted in personal devastation — leaving a path of mistrust that extended well beyond the organizational context.
How can this behavior be enabled to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still employed at Ventia? The answer , it appears, originates in a worrisome failure of governance within the company . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins acts without consequences .
This lack of consequence conveys kerikeri ventia a risky precedent : that title and position within the company can shield someone from repercussions . It breeds a damaging work setting, dispirits the workforce , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .